|
A relatively inexpensive Blu-ray Disc player, the Samsung BD-P1400 has performance to match its budget price.The Samsung BD-P1400 is, at this point, one of the older Blu-ray Disc players currently available. And its features reflect this: the Samsung...
At £259, the Samsung BD-P1400 remains among the least expensive Blu-ray Disc players available. But other models can offer better value...
|
|
|
Older-generation player consistently displays overly bright images; has on-board decoding of lossless audio codecs, but its audio sounds less full than that of other models.
Very good menus and documentation, Ethernet port for easy firmware updates...
Disappointing picture, Poor audio quality...
Older-generation player consistently displays overly bright images; has on-board decoding of lossless audio codecs, but its audio sounds less full than that of other models.
|
|
|
The Samsung BD-P1400 Blu-ray disc (BD) player ($449.99 list) is one of the most affordable models the company offers, and this tempting value includes better-than-average audio features for a first-generation standalone Blu-ray player. Samsung is als...
Relatively inexpensive. MP3/JPEG playback from recordable DVD. Support for bitstream audio output (HDMI). Decodes Dolby TrueHD. Online firmware updates.
Sluggish disc load times.
The BD-P1400 isnt the fastest Blu-ray disc player you can buy, but it provides a pleasing viewing experience and good audio format support for a relatively low price...
|
|
homecinemachoice.com Updated: 2013-04-01 03:36:02
|
|
|
hometheaterhifi.com Updated: 2013-04-01 03:36:05
|
Samsung set themselves apart from the Blu-ray pack last time around in our Secrets DVD Player Benchmark™ with the BD-P1200. While not the best Blu-ray player on the block, it did a commendable job with DVD playback thanks to the utilization of the new...
|
|
engadgethd.com Updated: 2013-04-01 03:36:08
|
Now that HD movies fans everywhere can all get behind one format, the next question is which player. Unlike HD DVD, theres lots to chose from and it can be difficult to figure out which is the best for you. The PS3 might be the obvious choice to some...
|
|
|
Samsung was the first company to launch a Blu-ray player in the UK, but the BD-P1000 didn't go down too well with the home entertainment cognoscenti - its spec was severely limited, with no HD audio or 24fps support, and because it converted 1080p picture...
The BD-P1400 is a marked improvement on the BD-P1000 in terms of design, performance and features and is superior to the feature-light Sony BDP-S300. But the Samsung's Profile 1.0 specification will make it outdated very quickly, and for this reason we re...
|
|
|
This is the third Samsung Blu-ray player that Ive evaluated. Samsung was the first on the block to release a Blu-ray player with the BD-P1000. This first model had a few hiccups in design, but ultimately after a few firmware updates, it provided dece...
|
|
avguide.com Updated: 2013-04-01 03:36:16
|
Samsung was the first manufacturer to introduce a Blu-ray player in the U.S. so it should come as no surprise that the company is now on its third generation. The BD-P1400 has a lot going for it, and it’s tied with the 40GB Sony PS3 as the least exp...
It is said that practice makes perfect, which is clearly illustrated by the BD-P1400. Okay, so it’s not quite perfect—it does not conform to Full Profile, and the analog audio output leaves something to be desired. But it certainly bests its predecesso...
|
|
|
It seems that the time for hi-def player has definitely arrived. Discs can be easily found for buying at any Wal-mart and you can easily rent the latest releases on any Blockbuster or Hollywood Video. And the greatest news is that this month Blu-Ray pl...
|
|
|
A bona fide Blu-ray bargain – but Sony and Panasonics machines still trump it for performance-per-pound value...
Very affordable. Decent spec. Good colour reproduction. Great with movement...
Not the very latest Blu-ray spec. Feels a bit lightweight. Lacks absolute detail in shadows. Struggles in 24fps mode...
A bona fide Blu-ray bargain – but Sony and Panasonics machines still trump it for performance-per-pound value...
|
|